The battle of a united European continent towards the good world powers outside its territory can be no much less ruinous than is the present struggle of the countries of Europe among themselves. Because of the large energy that today stands at the command of the state, a nationwide minority must expect the worst from a majority of a unique nationality. As long because the state is granted the huge powers which it has at present and which public opinion considers to be its proper, the considered having to stay in a state whose government is in the hands of members of a overseas nationality is positively terrifying.
Of course, even among the many Russian people there are some who do not share this perspective. It is only to be regretted that they haven’t been capable of prevail over their compatriots. Ever since Russia was first ready to train an affect on European politics, it has regularly behaved like a robber who lies in await the moment when he can pounce upon his victim and plunder him of his possessions. At no time did the Russian Czars acknowledge any other limits to the enlargement of their empire than those dictated by the pressure of circumstances. The position of the Bolsheviks in regard to the issue of the territorial expansion of their dominions isn’t a whit different.
The only factor that must be resisted is any tendency on our half to assist or promote the destructionist coverage of the Soviets. But the governments of Europe and America should stop promoting Soviet destructionism by paying premiums for exports to Soviet Russia and thereby furthering the Russian Soviet system by financial contributions. Let them stop propagandizing for emigration and the export of capital to Soviet Russia. the character of the Russian individuals, however that they had been borrowed by the Russians from Europe. So great is the intellectual sterility of the Russians that they had been never in a position to formulate for themselves the expression of their own inmost nature.
For the European nations that had at their disposal, apart from the old areas of settlement in Europe, overseas territories suitable for colonization by Europeans, this meant nothing greater than that they now settled part of their population abroad. In England’s case, for instance, a few of her sons now lived in Canada, Australia, or South Africa.
far from denying that the evil that the nations of the world want to fight by means of a policy of protectionism really is an evil. What he maintains is only that the means beneficial by the imperialists and protectionists can’t eliminate that evil.
champions and the opponents of particular privilege, there was by no means any question of the antisocial character of the entire system nor any want of maintaining the pretense of justifying it on social grounds. One can not, subsequently, draw any direct comparison between the old system of privileged orders and the activities and propaganda of the current-day parties of particular pursuits. Whether or not the Russian persons are to discard the Soviet system is for them to settle among themselves. The land of the knout and the jail-camp now not poses a threat to the world today. With all their will to warfare and destruction, the Russians are not succesful significantly of imperiling the peace of Europe.
What Is The Meaning Of Life? Ask A Conservative
- All antiliberal events need nothing but to safe special favors for their very own members, in full disregard of the resulting disintegration of the whole construction of society.
- Liberalism and capitalism created the foundations on which are primarily based all of the marvels characteristic of our fashionable lifestyle.
- They can not withstand for a moment the criticism that liberalism makes of their aims.
But what the supporters of this movement wish to set as an alternative is impracticable as a result of it lacks an important foundation in the consciousness of the individuals. And even if the objective of the Pan-European motion could be achieved, the world would not be in the least the better for it.
Aside from such coercive measures because the closed shop, compulsory strikes, and violent interference with those prepared to work, the only method the trade unions can have any influence on the labor market is by proscribing the supply of labor. For causes of practical politics, it’s attainable only to a limited extent for those engaged in a selected department of business to bar from it the remainder of the employees in the country. On the opposite hand, no particular political difficulty is concerned in imposing such restrictions on the doorway of international labor.
The law-abiding citizen by his labor serves each himself and his fellow man and thereby integrates himself peacefully into the social order. The robber, however, is intent, not on trustworthy toil, but on the forcible appropriation of the fruits of others’ labor. For thousands of years the world had to undergo the yoke of navy conquerors and feudal lords who merely took for granted that the merchandise of the business of different males existed for them to eat. The evolution of mankind towards civilization and the strengthening of social bonds required, to start with, overcoming the mental and bodily affect of the military and feudal castes that aspired to rule the world and the substitution of the best of the bourgeois for that of the hereditary lord. The movement in favor of the formation of a federation of European states has arisen from an accurate recognition of the untenability of all types of chauvinistic nationalism.
They too acknowledge no different rule than that, in the conquest of new lands, one may and certainly should go so far as one dares, with due regard to 1’s sources. The fortunate circumstance that saved civilization from being destroyed by the Russians was the fact that the nations of Europe have been strong sufficient to be able efficiently to face off the onslaught of the hordes of Russian barbarians. The experiences of the Russians in the Napoleonic Wars, the Crimean War, and the Turkish campaign of 1877–seventy eight confirmed them that, regardless of the nice variety of their soldiers, their army is unable to seize the offensive against Europe.
When associations of producers advocate protecting tariffs, the get together leaders usually take care not to point out that the pursuits of particular person teams and often even of particular person concerns are on no account equivalent and harmonious. The weaver is injured by tariffs on machines and yarn and can promote the protectionist motion solely in the expectation that textile tariffs shall be high enough to compensate him for the loss that he suffers from the opposite tariffs. The farmer who grows fodder calls for tariffs on fodder, which the cattle raisers oppose; the winegrower calls for a tariff on wine, which is just as disadvantageous to the farmer who does not happen to domesticate a vineyard as it’s to the city consumer. Nevertheless, the protectionists appear as a single get together united behind a standard program. This is made potential only by throwing a veil of obscurity over the reality of the matter.
It is frightful to live in a state during which at every turn one is uncovered to persecution—masquerading under the guise of justice—by a ruling majority. It is dreadful to be handicapped even as a baby at school on account of one’s nationality and to be in the wrong before every judicial and administrative authority because one belongs to a national minority. within the United States are kept above the peak that they would attain if there were full freedom of migration, whereas in Europe they’re depressed below this peak. On the one hand, the American employee gains; however, the European worker loses.